Does a set of all sets contain itself?
Look at it from a viewpoint of tiers to visualize it better. Pretend that each tier contains all the sub tiers below it.
The one at the top contains all tiers, but not itself, because the top tier has no original content to contribute.
A set of all sets does not contain itself, because it has no substance to contribute. You could argue that it does, saying you’re adding the zero of it’s non-material, but the end result doesn’t change regardless.
So, in the end, it’s just irrelevant.
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

Anonymous
That’s impossible to know. Simply stating that a woodchuck could chuck wood has no bearing on the amount of coordination it would have in it’s wood chucking. The more coordination, the less energy used and the more wood it could, in turn, chuck.
Nevermind that no duration is given. The longer the duration, the more outside influences could skew the data.
Edit: I am so sorry, I completely forgot that no weight is given for the wood in question. Or if the wood would be of a controlled weight/weight distribution.