1) Bon-Bon: And say what to them? “I need some help for the next four months and after that you’re out. But hey! If you’re lucky I might hire you back for six months next year!”
Bon-Bon: Nopony if any credibility is going to work for that. At least not for what I could afford to pay them.
2) Too much hand to stand.
3) I haven’t, but I’m not surprised; I hated the first one. The real headtrip is that Lion King 2 was pretty good.
4) I was aware of the general idea of it for a while, but this message got me to look more into it. I found a quote that sums up my feelings pretty well. “It would be absurd if it hadn’t forced people out of their homes for fear of their personal safety.”
For anypony on the side of ethics in game journalism, if that’s what your real concern is, why would you banner behind something that was originally formed to deliberately harass somepony?
For that matter, why care about game journalism at all? I’ve taken it with a grain of salt for most of my life. Some of my favorite games received extremely negative reviews or little publicity, so why should I care what somepony else reports on? They already don’t know what’s good.
If you have some other reason to side with it, I have nothing to say to you.
thenamedanonymous said: Are you fucking kidding me? “Gamergate” came about when unethical practices in gaming journalism was exposed. IT WAS NOT ORIGINALLY FORMED TO DELIBERATELY HARASS SOMEPONY!
allgreymatters liked this
asklyra posted this